<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for patterns in 10 years of &#039;light touch&#039; regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/</link>
	<description>About journalism in Singapore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:40:33 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Leong &#187; Interpreting the &#8220;Light Touch&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-29569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Leong &#187; Interpreting the &#8220;Light Touch&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/#comment-29569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Links: Cherian George, Looking for patterns in 10 years of &#8216;light touch&#8217; regulation               blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links: Cherian George, Looking for patterns in 10 years of &#039;light touch&#039; regulation               blog comments powered by Disqus  var disqus_url = [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Seng&#8217;s Blog : Blog Archive : journalism.sg Â» Looking for patterns in 10 years of &#8216;light touch&#8217; regulation</title>
		<link>http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>James Seng&#8217;s Blog : Blog Archive : journalism.sg Â» Looking for patterns in 10 years of &#8216;light touch&#8217; regulation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] (source)    This entry was posted on Saturday, September 1st, 2007 at 7:58 am and is filed under Random [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (source)    This entry was posted on Saturday, September 1st, 2007 at 7:58 am and is filed under Random [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haveahacks</title>
		<link>http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Haveahacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.sg/2007/08/23/looking-for-patterns-in-10-years-of-light-touch-regulation/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t agree that Sintercom over-reacted. Think Centre did actually have an agenda and had a &quot;management&quot; of sorts. Sintercom was a virtual community and the way that it was set up, who could really take responsibility to sign on the dotted line ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fundamentally, the govt applied old economy regulations (assuming that an organisation has a fixed place of business, defined hierachies and chains of command) to a new economy enterprise. Ultimately, Sintercom was a victim of timing. Tomorrow is essentially the same as Sintercom, but escaped regulation (so far) because the technology for self-publishing had already spread too far.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t agree that Sintercom over-reacted. Think Centre did actually have an agenda and had a &#034;management&#034; of sorts. Sintercom was a virtual community and the way that it was set up, who could really take responsibility to sign on the dotted line ?</p>

<p>Fundamentally, the govt applied old economy regulations (assuming that an organisation has a fixed place of business, defined hierachies and chains of command) to a new economy enterprise. Ultimately, Sintercom was a victim of timing. Tomorrow is essentially the same as Sintercom, but escaped regulation (so far) because the technology for self-publishing had already spread too far.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
